There is a lot going on in Israel these days. And there has been since its modern inception in 1948. This ancient people group and its goings-on are often at the center of the news. Is their biblical significance to this?
Over the past several years, I have been on my own journey regarding this topic. Because the view that believes in a future for Israel has come to be viewed with antagonism and condescension, I had to start to do some digging to answer the question: Is what I believe actually what the Bible teaches? Or am I just following the traditions of my childhood? And my study led me to a very definite conclusion: A resounding YES! Without a doubt, the Bible teaches in such detail and so clearly the truths I learned in my childhood regarding the future of Israel and also of this world.
I’ve been meaning to write about it but just not taken the time to do so. As my daughter (found on social media at Anchor for the Soul) and I have spent a lot of time discussing what the Bible says regarding the future of Israel, she finally decided to do her own research and write about it. As I’ve done in the past, I have asked her if I can re-post what she wrote here on the blog. I know many of you follow her on social media but I also know that some of you don’t have social media and I also believe this content is easier to share, save, and print from a blog post.
At the very least, I hope that you will spend some time reading what she has written. Everything she writes has been confirmed by my own personal study of this topic (which I have studied in-depth, as mentioned above).
As Jess was preparing this, one particular conversation stands out. We were discussing all she was learning and her eyes lit up as she expressed her joy and awe at discovering the truth for herself in God’s Word. I, too, have discovered this same joy and awe. There is nothing like it! Please, please, please do your own study of this topic. Don’t take our word for it! Study the Bible with an open mind and a literal perspective. And then study the miraculous history of the Jews. And then perhaps take some time to study the dubious beginnings of the opposite view. And when you do these things, I promise you that you, too, will be filled with joy and awe at our great God who plans and carries out those plans in such detail as to leave no doubt that He is in control and what He says will come to pass! It’s so amazing!
I hope what is written here will be a blessing to you. This can be a jumping off point for your own study, as a short post like this could only ever touch the surface of so large a topic. Eschatology (what the Bible teaches about the last days) is an extremely important topic and we really should know what the Bible teaches about it as we navigate the chaotic and confusing Christianity of today.
Thereโs been a lot of buzz recently on social media surrounding the nation of Israel. And Iโm sure thereโs quite a few of you who donโt know what you believe when it comes to Israel and eschatology. What is covenant theology? What is dispensational theology? Is God finished with Israel? Does the land have any significance at all? Has the church taken Israelโs place? Why does it even matter? This post is for you. Iโm going to attempt to give a crash course in the differences between covenant theology and dispensational theology. And then Iโm going to give you a few things to consider before choosing either one.
Iโm sure many will accuse me of oversimplifying. And, to a certain extent, I am. Thereโs only so much I can cover in a post like this. But Iโve seen post after post from the perspective of covenant theology and very little from any other point of view. My goal is to simply offer another perspective and help those of you who have no clue where to begin. I hope this is a starting point for you in studying the topic for yourself.
This post really isnโt for those of you already in the covenant theology camp. I donโt really expect to change your mind. And you arenโt going to change mine, either. My study on the topic in preparation for this post has only solidified my position even more. I hope that this post is gracious in its approach because I know there are many brothers and sisters in Christ who disagree with me on this topic. Please be gracious in return.
First things first. What am I even talking about?
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐:
Dispensationalism sees the Bible as the progress of revelation from creation to consummation, with a focus on how God works through distinct stages. The definition of dispensation is simply โ a system of order.โ
Dispensational theology teaches that there are two distinct peoples of God: Israel and the Church. God has one plan of salvation (grace through faith alone) throughout all time. The believing remnant from among Israel is saved by faith just as the true Church is saved by faith. But Israel is not the Church and the promises to national Israel have not been transferred to the Church. The promises God made to them in the Old Testament (covenants, land, descendants, blessings) will still be fulfilled literally.
Dispensationalism is committed to a literal interpretation of Scripture from beginning to end. So there will be a literal, one thousand year kingdom. We are not in that kingdom now. Therefore, Dispensational theology is also premillennial, meaning they believe that the millennium is still coming. The promises made to Israel will be fulfilled during that time. Jesus Christ will rapture His church and then bring judgement upon Israel (a literal tribulation with a literal antichrist) and ultimately bring them to repentance. He will literally rule for a thousand years from the throne of David in Jerusalem, fulfilling the many Messianic prophecies that were not fulfilled in His first coming.
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐:
Covenant theology sees the Bible through the lens of covenant, specifically the unfolding and expansion of Godโs covenant of grace. It emphasizes continuity and claims that there are three covenants and one people. These covenants are the covenant of redemption (pre-creation), the covenant of works, (pre-fall), and the covenant of grace (post-fall). The covenant of grace is at work in every covenant in the Bible after the fall.
Covenant theology presumes that Jesus is the true Israel and God now accepts all those who place their faith in Him as Israel. Essentially, Israel was the Church in the Old Testament and the Church is Israel in the New Testament. The Church is understood as the culmination of Old Testament prophecies about blessings for Israel and receives them all spiritually.
Those who hold to Covenant theology would say that the kingdom was ushered in when Christ came to earth and is a present, spiritual reality. They believe the tribulation is also an ongoing reality in the present age. History will end at Christโs second coming and the eternal state will begin. So they are amillennial because they reject the view that Jesus will physically reign on earth in a literal kingdom for one thousand years. They donโt believe in a rapture.
(Postmillennialism, in contrast, believes that Jesus will return after the Church has established His kingdom here on earth. The world will become better and โChristianizedโ through the influence of the Church. Most covenant theologists are not postmillennial, but the belief system has certainly paved the way for the view. You canโt be postmillennial without believing that the Church has replaced Israel.)
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐:
If Iโve heard the argument once, Iโve heard it a thousand times. โDispensationalism only emerged in the 1800โs with that silly Darby guy. Church history stands on our side. Therefore, weโre right.โ
First, is this claim true?
No. Chiliasm was the predominant viewpoint in the 1st-3rd centuries AD. It held a premillennial, literal view of Israel and the kingdom. Papias and Irenaeus both held this view, and both had a historical connection to the apostle John. Others include Barnabas, Justin Martyr, Tertullian, Methodius, and Lactanius.
Gentile leaders within the church began to reject Chiliasm as time went on. Augustine, influenced by his antisemitism and the gnostic belief that matter was evil, rejected any Biblical future for Israel and the idea of a literal kingdom on earth. To do so, he allegorized the book of Revelation and the promises made to Israel. Augustineโs influence shaped theology more than any other since the apostle Paul, and by the fourth century, amillennialism was the predominant view.
Do you think that the early church (who was directly influenced by Johnโs teaching) and those closely associated with him would have a correct understanding of what John meant by the millennium? Or do we think Augustine (who had no connection to the apostle John) had the better view, influenced by his hatred of the Jews and Gnosticism? Is Augustine our finally authority? Why?
The Catholic church distorted many key doctrines taught by the early church. The Protestant reformers began to clarify these doctrines, beginning with faith by grace alone. Few studied eschatology, most simply reverted back to Augustineโs view. Calvin, for example, wrote on every New Testament book except Revelation. Premillennialism never disappeared, though. John Bunyan, Thomas Brightman, Joseph Meade, Cotton Mather, Isaac Watts and Thomas Goodwin are just a few examples.
By the 1800โs, the doctrine of eschatology was finally studied on a larger scale (especially the book of Daniel) and clarified. And yes, Darby did play a role in this, among other men. Premillennialism became the dominant view for much of the 20th century, especially after Israel was miraculously gathered in 1948.
Secondly, does church history always prove something to be true?
No. Scripture always assumes priority over church history in regard to our beliefs. Pointing to the fact that the church was amillennial for much of its history does not automatically mean that itโs the correct view. Catholicism preached faith by works for nearly a thousand years. Would you have told Martin Luther he was wrong for standing on Scripture instead of on what the church taught historically? Church history is helpful, yes. But the Bible is always our final authority. Donโt prove your point with what other men have to say. Prove your point with the Bible.
————
Covenant theology is very popular. Dispensationalism is viewed as silly, backward, unintelligent. But here are 9 things you must consider before jumping on the bandwagon of covenant theology:
๐. ๐๐ง๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐
Covenant theology requires you to allegorize some portions of Scripture while using the historical-grammatical interpretation for others. Passages referring to national Israel, the millennium, and end times are interpreted allegorically while almost everything else is interpreted using the historical-grammatical method. Who are they to choose which passages are interpreted one way or the other?
So far, Biblical prophetic Scriptures have been fulfilled in accordance with the historical-grammatical method of interpretation, not the allegorical method.
Jesus really was pierced. He really was born of a virgin in Bethlehem. He literally rode on a donkey. The wise men followed a literal star. He really was in the grave for three days. He was born in Bethlehem. They literally cast lots on his garments. He was literally sold for thirty pieces of silver. I could go on and on.
Why do we think other prophecies (like the millennium and the tribulation) are fulfilled allegorically? And if they are, how do we know which ones are literally fulfilled and which spiritually or symbolically? All prophecies about the first coming were literal but all the prophecies about his second are symbolic? Unlikely.
๐. ๐๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ง๐๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐๐งโ๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฉ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐
Covenant theology depends for its credibility upon theological covenants with virtually no exegetical proof. The covenant of grace cannot be found directly in Scripture. Itโs simply a theological inference. And so the covenant of grace becomes the hermeneutical lens from which they view the rest of Scripture. Its inferences built on inferences.
The Covenant of redemption (a covenant between the trinity) and the covenant of works (a covenant between God and Adam) are also not found in Scripture.
In Covenant theology, the New Testament must be used to interpret the Old Testament. It denies the Old Testament its own perspicuity, integrity, and inspired revelation. Their interpretations veto the plain sense of Old Testament text. They create massive discontinuities all in the name of the demanded continuity of their covenant of grace and one-people of God concept. (which isnโt found in Scripture in the first place)
๐. ๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐๐จ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐๐จ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ง๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐ฌ๐ซ๐๐๐ฅ?
Here are just a few:
Earthly Land โ Gen. 12:7, 15:7-21, 28:13, Deut. 30:1-9, Isa. 62:1-5, 63:15-17, Jer. 3:18, Joel 2:21-24, Zeph. 3:15-20, Zech.14:8-21
Peace and Prosperity โ Isa. 2:1-5, 11:1-10, 26:1-4, 12, 30:15-26, 32:15-17, 35:1-10, 55:1-14, Mic. 4:1-7, Ezek. 36:33-36, Hos. 2:14-23, Joel 3:16-21, Amos 9:11-15
Israel to be the Head Nation and Jerusalem the Top City โ Deut. 26:19, 28:13, Joel 3:17, Jer. 23:5-8, Isa. 62:1-5, Zech. 8:20-23, 14:16-21)
A King on Davidโs Throne — Psa. 89:1-4, 28-37, Isa. 9:6-7, Jer. 3:14-18, Jer. 23:5, 30:8-9, 33:14-26, Ezek. 37:15-28, Zech. 12:6-9, 13:1
Perpetual Priesthood โ Num. 25:11-11-13, Psa. 106:30-31, Jer. 33:20-22, Ezek. 37:25-28, 40-48, Zech. 8:12-13, 14:16-21, Mal. 3:3-4
Gathering of rebellious Israel – Isa. 11:11-12, Jer 30:3, 31:6-9
Covenant theology would say that the Church has absorbed and appropriated the Old Testament prophecies and promises for Israel. One people, elect in the Old and New Testament, inheriting the heavenly promises of Christ.
But what do you do with the promises that donโt fit into that framework, like those above? Physical land, literal throne of David, gathering of a rebellious people, millennial reign. You have to make them โtypesโ or โshadowsโ of spiritual realities.
โWhen the plain makes sense, make no other senseโ seems an obvious approach to interpreting the Bible. Not so when it comes to Covenant theology and these hundreds of promises and prophecies made to and about Israel.
๐. ๐๐ข๐ญ๐๐ซ๐๐ฅ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐ฅ ๐๐ฅ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฌ?
In the Old Testament, God promised that Israel would be cursed for their disobedience. Chastening, slaughter, evil kings, and exile. Was this fulfilled literally? Absolutely.
And yet the promised blessings are spiritual and for the church? If national Israel received the promised cursing literally, will they not also receive the promised blessings literally?
โThe scattering was literal; so also will be the gathering. The pulling down of Zion was literal; so also will be the building up. The rejection of Israel was literal; so also will be the restoration.โ – J.C. Ryle
๐. ๐๐ฌ๐ซ๐๐๐ฅ & ๐๐จ๐โ๐ฌ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ
It is clear that Israel specifically is to endure Godโs judgement in the end (Jeremiah 30:7, Zec 13:1-9, Rev. 7:4-8) and yet the Church is not appointed to wrath and the judgement that is to come (1 Thessalonians 5:9). How can both of these be true if Israel is the Church and the Church is Israel?
๐. ๐๐๐ญ๐๐ง ๐ก๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐
Revelation 20 is clear that Satan is bound during the thousand years. Is Satan bound now? Does he wield any power on earth right now? Of course he does! Then how can we be in the thousand year kingdom in this present age, either literally or figuratively?
๐. ๐๐ก๐ฒ ๐๐จ๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ก๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐ก ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ฉ๐ฉ๐๐๐ซ ๐๐๐ญ๐๐ซ ๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐?
The Church takes center stage in the Bible beginning in Acts 2. This continues until Revelation 3. After that, the Church is never mentioned again (Revelation 4-22) and Israel takes center stage. Why? Because the Church has been raptured! If the New Covenant revealed that the Church and Israel are one and the same, why switch back to using the word Israel after Revelation 3?
๐. ๐๐ก๐ ๐ฆ๐ข๐ซ๐๐๐ฅ๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ง๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐ฌ๐ซ๐๐๐ฅ
How do you explain that Israel is the only surviving people group from Bible times? How do you explain how they were miraculously gathered back into the promised land (according to prophecy)? How do you explain the hatred of the nations toward them (according to prophecy)? How do you explain their survival as a nation while surrounded by powerful enemies? Is it really all a coincidence? None of it makes sense apart from the Bible.
How about all the prophecy you can see being fulfilled literally right before our eyes? A literal apostasy of the Church, the technology, the stage being set for the antichrist and everything the Bible tells us heโs going to do? Itโs undeniable if you open your eyes to see it.
๐: ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ฌ ๐ & ๐๐
I wish I had more time to go into Romans 9 & 11. But itโs clear that there are two distinct groups of people in that passage. If Israel and the Church were the same, this is where Paul would have told us. We can be sons of Abraham by faith (Galatians 3:6-9) without being the same as Israel. There is clear distinction for the offspring of Jacob (Isaiah 65:9, Jeremiah 46:21) and thatโs why the tribulation is called โJacobโs troubleโ (Jeremiah 30:7)
———–
The burden of proof is on Covenant theology. Show us. Where does it say the Church is Israel? How do you determine which passages are allegory and which are literal? How do you explain your assumption that God equivocates and breaks his non-conditional covenants?
These are things you must consider and questions you have to answer before picking one side or the other. I think itโs obvious. But study it for yourself! Message me if youโd like some of the articles, sermons, and resources I used in preparing this post.
Iโll leave you with this quote by J.C. Ryle written long before Israel became a nation in 1948:
โ๐๐ข๐ฆ๐ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ ๐ฆ๐, ๐ข๐ ๐ ๐๐ญ๐ญ๐๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ญ๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ช๐ฎ๐จ๐ญ๐ ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฉ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ฐ๐ก๐ข๐๐ก ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ฒ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฌ๐ซ๐๐๐ฅ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ซ๐๐ฏ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐. ๐๐ฌ๐๐ข๐๐ก, ๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฆ๐ข๐๐ก, ๐๐ณ๐๐ค๐ข๐๐ฅ, ๐๐จ๐ฌ๐๐, ๐๐จ๐๐ฅ, ๐๐ฆ๐จ๐ฌ, ๐๐๐๐๐ข๐๐ก, ๐๐ข๐๐๐ก, ๐๐๐ฉ๐ก๐๐ง๐ข๐๐ก, ๐๐๐๐ก๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐ก ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐๐ฆ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ง๐ . ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐๐ญ, ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฅ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฎ๐ฅ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ, ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ง๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐ง๐ฌ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ฐ๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ข๐ซ ๐จ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ฏ๐จ๐ซ ๐จ๐ ๐๐จ๐. ๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ฒ ๐ง๐จ ๐๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ฆ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ข๐ง๐๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ ๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฉ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ญ๐๐ซ. ๐ ๐๐ฆ ๐ฐ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐๐ฐ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ฒ ๐๐ฑ๐๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐ก๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ง๐ฌ ๐๐๐ง๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ญ ๐๐ฌ ๐ ๐๐จ. ๐ ๐๐๐ง ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐๐ฒ, ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฆ๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐๐ฌ, ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐ฏ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฌ๐ซ๐๐๐ฅ ๐๐ฌ ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐จ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐, ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ข๐ซ ๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ข๐ซ ๐ง๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐จ๐, ๐๐ฉ๐ฉ๐๐๐ซ ๐๐ฌ ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ซ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ซ๐๐ฏ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐๐ง๐ฒ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐ก๐๐๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง ๐๐จ๐’๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐.โ